Wednesday, July 15, 2015

11/07/2015 Batman V Superman Trailer Shot for Shot Analysis

(Or 07/11/2015, for Americans. For some reason)





Three days ago today the mesmerizing new trailer for 'Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice' premiered. I've spent the following three days rewatching it. These are my findings. I decided to make a screenshot of every single shot (uninterrupted piece of film) and number them for cross reference. Some shots have multiple screenshots to accommodate a pan (shot 11), zoom (shot 13) or changing action (shot 98). These will be distinguished by the addition of letters. I will talk about the visual aspects as well as the dialogue. Keep in mind that this analysis is not going to be objective but rather the highly opinionated word-vomit of a DC fanboy.
Now, to quote a fellow madman: Here... we...go.

1.

This is Concerned Looking Political Lady. Remember her for later, she's going to be important.

During shots 1 through 6 she says:
"Today is a day for truth. The world needs to know what happened. And to know what he stands for. That kind of power is very dangerous."
Her monologue appears to be a bit jumbled up, because of the way it's cut for the trailer, but the gist or her position is clear. Rather than heralding Superman for saving the world, she paints him in a negative light for the collateral damage in Metropolis. It's like she's the internet personified. I suspect she has her personal reasons for her views, but more on that at shot 13.

2.

Here we see Superman  landing at the Capitol building to appear before congress (he's right behind the 'Aliens are un-American' sign). There is a large group of people there to protest Superman. Not his actions mind you, they are protesting his very existence. This of course falls right into the comfort zone of the Westboro Baptist Church, who decided to show up as well. Also note the sign that says 'Superman Lives', no doubt referencing the unfinished Superman film directed by Tim Burton.

Already the film has a decidedly Zack Snyder-y look to it (which, in my opinion, is mostly a good thing. It also suggest less studio involvement, but that's just speculation).

3.

The Man of Steel looks up to the Capitol building in reverence. A good sign ('Truth, Justice and the American Way', and all that). We also get a decent first look at the upper half of his updated suit. I like the added decoration in the emblem, but colour-wise it looks strangely metallic. It looks kind of cool, but I still would have preferred cloth (Christopher Reeve style) or at least something less textured. The size of the logo and the thickness of the cape are perfect.

4.

Superman enters the Senate looking like a boss. Some of these people couldn't care less though. Weird. His suit is still tragically dark. Especially the blue is very much desaturated. One would think that the creative team would take the chance to use Superman's bright colours to visually offset him against the dark toned Batman. One would be wrong.

Notice how the shot is framed symmetrically, yet slightly off center. Presumably to create a slight sensation of discomfort.

5.

Concerned Looking Political Lady is shown to be in a powerful position within the senate (I think it's fair to presume that she one of its leaders). At first I thought she might even be the Vice President of the US (seeing as how the Vice President of the United States presides over the Senate), but she is later in the trailer addressed as 'senator'. Oddly enough the seal that is shown is the presidential seal instead of the senate seal. Maybe it's hinting that the president is in the room, maybe the prop department is being cheap.

Looking at this scene it looks like they're doing the whole Pontius Pilate shtick again. Which would fit into the film's narrative by the looks of it, but it would also be somewhat redundant. Not in the last place because they did it in the last film already.

6.

Superman is here to defend himself and judging by the confident look on his face, this is going to be a cool scene.

7.

Our first look at Bruce Wayne in this trailer. One might say he hit the ground running. The shaky cam in this scene made it hard to find a decent screencap, which is a bad sign. I'm really hoping the shaky cam style of filming will be limited to this scene.

8.

Bruce looking at Zod's laser beams destroying the building, confirming that he was in fact in Metropolis during the third act of Man of Steel, as many have speculated.

9.

His reaction shows more anger than shock, suggesting that he knows people inside the building. Maybe he's even on the phone with someone that's inside the building, which would mean that he's probably shouting something along the lines of "Get out!". Speculation for the moment, but this will soon find credence.

10.

The building, as seen from another angle, collapses while Superman is being thrown through the wall. This visual is extremely significant for Bruce's emotional motivation. This is the first time he sees Superman and immediately he associates him with the death of those that where killed in the collapse of the building. He also sees him in a moment of weakness, immediately establishing Superman as someone who is not indestructible.

11 A.

While others run away, Bruce stays true to character and rushes to help.

11 B.

Dude even runs straight into the dust. Cool shot.

12.

Bruce comforts (and has quite possibly saved) a little girl amidst the rubble of the building. This could be a random girl, but she could also be essential to the plot. She appears to have red hair which gives me two ideas. Idea#1: The girl is the daughter of Concerned Looking Political Lady, motivating her to do something we see her do later on (shots 47,48,49). Idea#2: She's one of Jim Gordon's kids. I hope she's not Barbara though, cause I'd love to see her as Batgirl in the DC Cinematic Universe later on (the other Batgirls are cool and all, but if Batgirl is to appear in the DCCU I really hope it's Barbara before anyone else. She is the essential Batgirl).

13 A.

Cool shot, I'm a sucker for the vengeful look into the sky, no matter how overdone it might be. The camera zooms out to reveal...

13 B.

...the building is Wayne's (sign on the left). That's why I was so sure before when I said he knew people inside.

Concerned Looking Political Lady resumes her monologue:
"Let the record show that the committee holds him responsible."
Again, harsh words suggesting emotional involvement. More reason to believe she is the little girl's mother. Also, pairing those words with the image of Bruce Wayne leaves no doubt on his feelings towards Superman.

14.

Alfred walking towards what can presumed to be what's left of Wayne Manor. So, what the hell has happened to it? I have two ideas again. Idea#1: The Joker has blown up the building, killing someone who I'm not going to mention now because it ruins the surprise of another shot if you missed it when watching the trailer yourself (shots 55, 56). Idea#2: When Batman retired (it has been confirmed that Batman has actually hung up his mantle prior to Man of Steel) he blew up his belongings in order to protect his identity, similar to his actions in 'The Dark Knight Returns'.
Of course, those are not the only options. The culprit might as well have been something like an earthquake, like in Batman: Cataclysm, which incidentally has quite a similar Wayne Manor (pictured below).


The shot looks a bit unfinished, as the building matte looks a bit off. Especially perspective wise and how it's just sitting on the horizon. The glow around it gives it much of an Adobe After Effects look.

15.

Our first look inside the Batcave. Looks decent, but Burton still has the best live action Batcave in my opinion. This shot is quite useful in figuring out where characters are in subsequent shots (there's a scene in the red room, a scene in the room slightly left of center and on the right there is... oh boy, that's for later).

16.

Bruce receiving a newspaper clipping while Alfred repeats his monologue from the last trailer during shots 16 through 22, this time landing on an image of Alfred himself:
"That's how it starts. The fever. The rage that turns good men cruel."


17.

Holy shit dude. Who wrote this? Most people are guessing the Joker, but my money is on Lex Luthor trying to get a rise out of Bruce Wayne. This seems to suggest that he knows Batman's identity, but that isn't a necessity. Bruce Wayne is a powerful man, fanning the flames of his hatred towards Superman would be beneficial to Luthor all on its own.

18.

Bruce reacts to the newspaper. This shot doesn't seem that significant at first glance, but that's a portrait of his father in the background (on the left), quite darkly echoing the message in the last shot.

See?
Interestingly, the portrait of Thomas Wayne in 1989's 'Batman' is painted almost exactly the same, only mirrored. This prop department knows what's what.


The fact that this emphasis is usually placed on just his father is a bit odd though. Martha died too, you know. The perfectly crafted Animated Series by comparison never had these kind of hiccups:

Notice the necklace on Martha,
later to attract the attention of one Joe Chill.
19.

Bruce training to become Batman once again. I didn't know this type of training was a thing, but apparently it's something professional athletes actually do. Now, I said that it is Bruce training, and that's clearly what we're supposed to take from this, but what if that isn't him? I mean, we don't really see his face and his hair looks awfully black instead of grey. Could this be a weakened Superman training on human level?

20 / 21.


We've already seen these shots in the previous trailer, but they're still cool. Back when the previous trailer came out, I had a suspicion regarding something in the background of shot 21. That suspicion is now confirmed by shots 55/56, but we'll get there when we get there.

22.

First look at Alfred. Looks great in my opinion. They even gave him Michael Gough's glasses (well, almost). I'm still waiting for the day Alfred actually looks like his comic book counterpart though.

The legendary Michael Gough, for the filthy heretics among
you who might have trouble picturing him.
23.

Looks like Batman is getting himself in trouble with the GCPD again. Where's Jim Gordon in all this?
Batman and the police didn't see eye to eye in 'The Dark Knight Returns' either.
Also, this panel is hilarious.
24.

Shine that thing somewhere else, will ya?

25.

First look at this film's version of the iconic batarang (or, more acurately, bat-shuriken). Classic Batman.

26.

I have to be honest with you guys, I don't have the faintest clue who this might be. I mean... he's wearing a ring, so maybe he's a depowered Green Lantern? As in, this would be Kyle Rayner before Hal takes over because I assume the Justice League's Green Lantern is going to be Hal Jordan. Clearly, I'm grasping at straws here. Hey, wait a minute... that thing on his chest... is that...

27.

Holy shit, Batman totally branded this guy! That's insane! Unless of course someone else did it in order to paint Batman in a bad light.

28.

Bats! This shot could be from an origin story flashback. It could also mean that Batman uses sonar in order to let Bats unwillingly help him in his Batmanning (yes, Batman is a verb now. Deal with it), like in Frank Miller's 'Batman: Year One' (and 'Batman Begins', which copied the scene).


29.

From shots 25 through here we hear what I presume to be Clark Kent's voice:
"This bat vigilante is like a one man reign of terror."
Prompting Perry White to respond:
"You don't get to decide what the right thing is."

This is what I love about Perry White. After all, he's not wrong. Clark is a reporter, not a columnist. His opinions on the matter are irrelevant.

30.

That chin. Yum. I mean, uhm... aw screw it. By the way, is it mandatory for guys to wear either plaid or a sweater vest at the Daily Planet? Because all the guys are either wearing plaid or a sweater vest.

31.

Perry:
"Nobody cares about Clark Kent taking on the Batman."

GET IT? Hardyharhar.

32.
















Cool lighting.

33.

A closer look at the emblem. The detail is great, metallic colour is a bit much.

34.

Lois Lane recalls one of the better scenes in Man of Steel as she lays her hand on the emblem and says (shot 33 through 37):
"This means something. It's all some people have. It's all that gives them hope."

35.

I like the idea of people directing their cries for help directly towards Superman in times of need. I don't know from where these people produced a bucket of paint and a roller though. Based on this image combined with the following two I think that there might be a short scene proceeding this where the man is highly skeptical of Superman to the point of animosity but the woman sees him in a good light to the point of deifying him, like a micro version of what's going on in America and probably the world.

36 / 37.


More credence to that deification I was talking about. Also note the red and blue colour scheme on the woman and the placing of Superman near the sun.

38.

There is no way there are simultaneously that much light pollution and that many visible stars, but I'll allow it because it looks pretty neat. For some reason this image just screams 'Smallville' to me. So, you know, great.

39.

Ma Kent (shot 38 through 46):
"People fear what they don't understand. Be their hero, Clark. Be their angel. Be their monument. Be anything they need you to be. Or be none of it. You don't owe this world a thing. You never did."
What the hell kind of speech is that? Imagine if in Lord of the Rings Aragorn would have said: "A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day! Or maybe it is, I dunno."

40.

Classic Superman.

41.

A different cut of an otherwise previously seen shot. Supes seems to drop by in Mexico in the middle of Día de Muertos solely to echo the mountain of skulls dream of the first movie. Of course, I'm sure there will be more to it in the actual movie.

42 / 43 / 44.



This looks like Superman is saving the manned capsule of a Russian space shuttle, but knowing how much this film owes to 'The Dark Knight Returns' he might also be stopping a nuclear weapon.

Side note: Shot 44 looks very Zack Snyder-esque.

Off topic, but "Twenty million die by fire if I am weak" is a great line.

45.

I got nothing.

46.

I don't like the way Superman is looking at Ma Kent here. Sure, her monologue sounded pretty stupid at the end there, but he doesn't have to react like that to her face for it. Maybe it's just my irritation that Superman doesn't get to smile in the entire trailer. Batman is supposed to be the brooding one, not Supes.

47 / 48 / 49.



Concerned Looking Political Lady visits the weirdly cast Lex Luthor (yeah, I still can't wrap my head around Jesse Eisenberg being Luthor). This is partially why I figured the little girl from shots 12 and 13 might be her daughter. Clearly the little girl wasn't hanging around Wayne Finances by herself. So where is her guardian? I think it's possible that the girl's father/this woman's husband died in Metropolis, making it emotionally easier for her to go through extremes to get to Superman, even if it means cooperating with a clearly shady Lex Luthor.

Luthor:
"Do you know the oldest lie in America, senator? Devils don't come from Hell beneath us, they come from the sky."
I get that he's trying to fan the flames regarding the senator's opinions on Superman, but the awkward phrasing makes it sound like he's saying that devils do in fact come from Hell beneath us.

50.

In a rather curious turn of events we see Superman kneeling before Luthor. You've got my attention, movie!

51.

Had this been the calm, calculated and menacing Lex Luthor of the comics, this would be a chilling scene indeed. Now, it's mostly just weird. Maybe it'll be different in context though.

52.

Superman doesn't seem weakened by Kryptonite and the resentful look on his face shows that he's probably not being mind controlled either. That possibly leaves us with blackmail.

53.

An accomplish of Luthor (assuming this is the same woman we saw from the back in panel 47) is leading the way for two soldies to transport a box that in all probability contains the body of Zod as seen in the next shot. The fact that the soldiers are even there is pretty significant. I'm guessing Luthor used Concerned Looking Political Lady to get the body of Zod from the government (a dead alien was lying around after the first film, of course it was being kept by a government agency).

Side note: Is it just me or does that woman look exactly like Mirage from 'The Incredibles'? You guys see it too right?

54.

There's that Zod I was talking about. Maybe Luthor uses his body to study the biology of Kryptonians on order to gain a better understanding on how to beat Superman?

55 / 56. Robin!


There it is, the money shot. The thing that has exploded throughout the internet. The main reason I choose to do this analysis in the first place. Robin's suit, battered. Defaced by the Joker. The consensus on the internet is that this is the suit of Jason Todd (second Robin), propped up as a memorial like in the comics. Could be. In 'A Death in the Family' the Joker mercilessly beats Jason unconscious with a crowbar after which he leaves him in a building he then promptly blows up, killing Jason. Remember the state of Wayne Manor in shot 14? Looks like that exact scenario might have taken place there. I also spot at least one bullet hole. Like I mentioned before, the way it's propped up is also very reminiscent of Jason Todd. Here's an example of the memorial in the comics:


It's hard to miss the similarity.

Oddly enough, the first appearance of the memorial was before the actual death of Jason Todd was even a thing. In the pages of 'The Dark Knight Returns', a comic that takes place in Batman's future, predicting something would happen to at least one of the Robins. If you've been paying attention, you're beginning to see how much this film owes to this comic. Which makes the idea that the suit is in fact Jason Todd's all the more probable. Here's the memorial in 'The Dark Knight Returns':


There are two things people don't seem to have noticed however. First of, there's the fact that the suit looks much more like Tim Drake's (third Robin). Secondly, the weapon it is holding is also suspiciously similar to Tim Drake's weapon of choice.

This is Tim Drake.
Notice the priest-like high collar, pointy logo and the weapon he's holding.
So, what's going on here? I think the Robin referred to in the film is actually an amalgamation of Robins. Jason Todd and Tim Drake mixed into one character. Hell, maybe even Dick Grayson (first Robin) is in the mix. I hope he's not though, it would be cool if Nightwing is out there somewhere ('somewhere' being Blüdhaven for the moment, I guess).

57.

First (moving) look at Gal Gadot in the film. Not as Wonder Woman yet, because these guys know how to tease. Her choice of clothing could have no significance at all, it could also be a nod to the comics. You see, during the 70s, Diana wanted to part with her past and thus choose to trade her traditional outfit for casual clothing. Stuff that was hip at the time. Although she has actually worn a lot of different outfits through the issues, somehow artists that now hark back to that period seem to fall back on one or two of her white outfits time and time again. So that might be why someone at the costume department thought to cloth Diana in white. Or maybe it just looks cool and I'm over analyzing things.
Maybe should have kept those bullet reflecting bracelets though, Di.


58.

You can see in shot 15 that there's a red room in the Batcave, so that's where they're at.

59.

I have no idea how these Superman logo wearing soldiers are going to factor into the movie. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, it's nice not to know every once in a while. Surprise me, Chris Terrio!

60.

"He has the power to wipe out the entire human race." Bruce says while looking sternly at Alfred (beginning from shot 58). Superman kind of looks like he's seriously considering it in this shot (he's not, of course). Bruce also said something else before that, but I'm not properly picking up what.

61 / 62 / 63.



Batman resurrects the Bat signal. He's lucky the thing still works or else he would have looked a bit foolish up there. I love that there is graffiti on the roof of the police station. Really goes to show what kind of city Gotham is. Looks like the graffiti near Batman's head might say 'Kane', after supposed Batman creator Bob Kane. If that's the case I'm crossing my fingers for a graffiti piece ten times as big referencing Bill Finger.

64.

Great shot that just oozes 'Batman'. Interestingly, our introduction to the bat signal is framed quite similar to the introduction of the bat signal in 1989's 'Batman':


65.

Kudos for defusing the detail on the signal. Would've looked glaringly unrealistic of that tiny head actually showed up on the clouds.

66.

Bruce:
"I will have to destroy him."

Batman's battle armour, by the way, is taken directly from the pages of 'The Dark Knight Returns'.




67.

Clearly, this shot is taken from the introduction of Aquaman in the film. I'm guessing the curious young diver sees him but mistakes him for a statue or something of the sort. Then, when he goes to reach, Aquaman looks up, startling the diver. I don't think his role in the movie will be much more than a cameo. At least I hope not, introducing too many Justice League members now would make the movie too dense.

Jason Momoa as Aquaman.
I saturated the colour. You're welcome.
68.

These are most likely the Amazons of Themyscira (Paradise Island). Maybe coming to aid Wonder Woman, but more likely during a flashback or hers. Side note: who's with me in hoping there's a Lynda Carter cameo as Hippolyta or Artemis? Maybe throw Lucy Lawless in there for good measure...

69.
Hey Joe, Whatta ya doin' with that gun in your hand?
The obligatory Wayne murder.

70.

I'm calling it now: Best live action Thomas Wayne yet. Also, you can't tell by this shot, but the Waynes are actually leaving the cinema after having seen 'The Mark of Zorro', which then becomes a mayor influence on Bruce. Below is a set picture confirming this. This detail of Batman's origin story has been canon since its introduction in, you guessed it, 'The Dark Knight Returns' (also pictured below).



71 / 72.


Do I even have to site 'The Dark Knight Returns' as a mayor influence anymore?


Side note: this scene is looking very Zack Snyder-ish. Cool.

73.

Wait, the Waynes are dead? I'm shocked. Shocked, I tell ya.

74.

The Batwing flying over a burning rural area. At least I think it's the Batwing, could be Wonder Woman's jet.

75.

I should probably be talking about Lois Lane here, but what's up with that guys's hair?

76.

Speaking of people in the background, are those Mike and Molly? That's random.

77.

There's Diana Prince again. Note the blue and red colour scheme. Also, valet guy finds little joy in his job.

78.

There it is, after all this time! Wonder Woman in action! It's, uhm, well, is it dickish to say that Gal Gadot has a weird rage face? I'm mean, not to rain on anyone's parade or anything, but that's just odd looking.

79.

This quick shot is the only shot we're getting where we almost see her full body and thus is the best look so far into how those controversial muted colours look on film. Also, she's putting her gauntlets together to counter something. This is significant because of the next shot.

80.

Boom! Tokyo Fireball all up in yo face! Because of the shot proceeding this, we are left to assume that this is the amount of energy Wonder Woman got blasted at her during the fight. Holy shit. This almost must mean that we are to see a highly powerful nemesis in this film. I'm talking people like Darkseid, Doomsday, Metallo, Mongul... mayor league players like that.

81 / 84.


Batman in this getup reminds me of the Batman from 'JSA: Liberty Files':


With the pouch straps from 'The Dark Knight Returns' added around his leg:

He's not using that gun to kill anyone,
ease your cheese.
82 / 83.


Still not a clue.

85 / 87.

DAT ASS
This looks awfully familiar. I'm not exactly complaining though, this looks awesomely familiar:



86.

It's a quick shot, but it already looks like an awesome action scene.

88.

Stop trying to look scummy, Superman. It doesn't suit you.

89.

Shots 81 to here, Alfred:
"You're gonna go to war. He is not our enemy."
This, together with what we heard previously, makes me very hopeful for Alfred. It really looks like they're getting his character right. When Alfred sees something going a way he doesn't like, you bet your ass he's telling. At many times, Alfred has been the angel on Bruce's shoulder. He is the one that keeps him in check when things go awry.

90.

The cop is motioning the cyclist to slow down or stop, but nobody is actually making a real effort to stop the guy, so I'm assuming it's Lex Luthor.

Where the hell is that lens flare coming from?

91.

Again, where the hell is that lens flare coming from?

92.

Damn, son. That's enough kryptonite to fuel an evil cyborg.

93 / 94.

MY BODY IS READY
...

95.

Why yes, you are looking at Batman crashing through the roof with Superman under his feet while looking directly into the camera. Why'd you ask?

96.

Another shot of Wonder Woman. One that clearly isn't finished yet, because that wall behind her is the fakest looking shit I have seen in a long while. I mean, really now. That look on her face is pretty awesome though.

97.


98 A.

Just in case this movies connotations to a certain comic wasn't clear yet.


98 B.

Batman's grappling gun has been a staple since its introduction in 1989's 'Batman'. Before that it was just a grappling hook, but Batman swinging on it was still an iconic image (see figure A for Jim Lee rocking this). In fact, the very birth of Batman included him swinging about. No, not on an umbilical cord you weirdo. I meant his first appearance, see figure B. For this movie to use that image so eloquently, well, let's just say they made this Batman fan very happy.

Figure A
Figure B

99.

"Black and blue, god versus man. Day versus night."
So there's that. I betting ten bucks that this quote will make the DVD cover.

100.

Dude, Amy Adams is in your arms, can't you at least smile now? Somebody better be dead.

101.

Damn, that looks like some serious shit is about to go down.

102.

Crashing through windows. Another classic Batman move. Here he is doing it in '89:


103.

I wasn't trying to make a wacky screencap, promise. This is the guy's face during the entire shot. He's saying "The redcapes are coming, the redcapes are coming.", liking himself to Paul Revere.

104.

Speaking of red capes, screw Edna Mode, that cape rocks.

105.

Superman ripping the top off the Batmobile. Another shot straight out of 'The Dark Knight Returns'. This shot is much more grainy than the others, which leads me to believe that the shot is cropped specifically for the trailer. If that's the case, what exactly are they hiding?

106.

For the third goddamn time, where the fuck is that lens flare coming from? I mean, other than that it looks like a cool scene, but that's exactly the problem: why obscure it?

Although I think that the reason why the Batmobile immediately looked so familiar is because it's basically Burton's Batmobile with Nolan's detailing, the resemblance to its comic book counterparts for the last years also deserves a mention. Compare this side shot for example with this Batmobile from Batman Inc.:


And that brings us the the end of the trailer. I don't know about you guys, but I'm stoked to see the movie. No more promotional material for me though, that was quite enough. Any more information than this and we're venturing into highly spoiler-y territory, I imagine.

My main conclusion after seeing the trailer is that this is probably going to be a better Batman movie than a Superman movie. Now, Batman is my favorite DC character so I'm glad people are doing him justice (or at least seem to so far), but that doesn't lessen the fact that I also love Superman and want him to be accurately presented as well. I actually liked Man of Steel, but I hoped that Superman would get the change to lighted up a bit in the sequel. Looks like that's not going to happen. Kudos for accurately trying to portray people's first reaction to Superman though.
Overall, despite some apparent hiccups on Superman's side of the story, I think this is going to be a good movie. Or an entertaining one at least.

All screenshots are property of Warner Brothers, DC Comics.
All comic scans are property of DC Comics.

Thursday, July 02, 2015

So... about that flag.


The Confederate flag waving on government property has been raising eyebrows for decades. The flag has flown atop or in front of the South Carolina statehouse in Columbia since 1961. So why the controversy now? It seems to be quite directly due to the racially motivated church shooting in Charleston, South Carolina. People seem to directly blame such violence on the historically explicitly racist symbols and names adorning the streets of the south. To me, that seems like a shift of blame that is as counterproductive as blaming the Columbine shootings on video games or rock 'n' roll.
The flag is not responsible for the Charleston church shooting. Rather, both are products of southern exclusiveness and isolation by ego centrism.

The days in which the flag was purely the banner for team slavery are long gone. It is now simply the flag for a certain subset of people living in the US. However, that doesn't erase its history.

Consider for a moment the swastika. It used to be a symbol of fortune, a token of good luck. I could wear a shirt with a big ol' swastika on it and use it to mean what it used to mean pre-Nazism. However, this is clearly not how people would read that shirt. Even though my intent would be nothing but good, people would still be hurt by the heavily negative emotions and actions associated with that symbol.
Reverse the chronology and the Confederate flag has the exact same problem. Most of those who wave the flag today don't do it to conjure up images of institutionalized racism, but rather images of neighborly barbecues and songs by the campfire. That isn't the case for those outside of that culture where most do perceive the flag as threatening due to its racist history.

So, the same way you might wave a swastika around in India and not in Germany, maybe flying the Confederate flag in the United Stated is not the best of ideas. But again, implying that the flag and symbols like it are the cause of the problem is taking the influence of the flag way too far and is ultimately detrimental to finding answers to situations like these.

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Grimm Meets Gail Collins

Those of you interested in Feminist Theory, psychoanalysis of gender roles in western society and more specifically the Male Gaze might me interested in this reworking of The Frog Prince by the-Toast's own  Mallory Ortberg.

(This doesn't have anything to do with anything on my blog, I just thought I'd give you guys a heads up on a story I like)

Monday, June 22, 2015

TMNT (2014) Movie Review

© Paramount Pictures / Nickelodeon Movies

This movie was not as bad as I anticipated. Then again, I expected the worst.

Back in September 2014 I sat down in a eerily quiet theater to watch a film I wasn't really looking that forward to seeing, but I sort of had to, because that's just the kind of sad creature I am. The following day I wrote about 90% of a review, only for it to gather dust until now. For some reason. Today I've blown off the dust and finished the review (hold your roaring applauses).
The review is categorized into 'The Good', 'The Bad' and 'The Ugly'. Not because the film has anything to do with Clint Eastwood at all, but because I am just that cheesy and I'm thinking about using that format more often. Now, on with the review!

The Good.

William Fichtner isn't Shredder!
Don't get me wrong, I've got nothing against William Fichtner. However, when it seemed he was going to play Shredder it really didn't resonate well with me for the sole reason of Shredder being Asian whereas Fichtner is white. Well, that and the idea of Shredder being a businessman. Yuck. Instead, Tohoru Masamune is now playing Shredder and the dude is downright awesome, albeit scarcely used.

Will Arnett as Vernon Fenwick.
Even though this interpretation of the character is a far cry from his animated counterpart, I was entirely on board with it. Which is probably a testament to Arnett's talents. His interpretation of Vernon might not be the pinnacle of Arnett's work, but it is enjoyable none the less.

The soundtrack (meaning pop songs used in the film, not the actual score).
The uses for Hollaback Girl and Careless Whisper are actually reasonably funny and work well in my opinion. And the scene where Michelangelo sings Happy Together to April is excused too, even though I don't like the Michelangelo-likes-April-a-bit-too-much thing at all. Why? Two reasons: 1) The band originally preforming the song is called The Turtles, so that's kind of clever. 2) Who can stay mad when one of the happiest songs ever conceived is being sung by a giant anthropomorphic turtle? No one, that's who.

The Turtles are done right.
They have the right personalities and in-group relations. Too bad they had as little screen time as they did (too bad they look like shit too, more on that later). When we did see them interact with each other, it was clear that at least someone did their homework during the production of this film. All their characteristics match the turtles you know and love.

Michelangelo is genuinely funny.
When he isn't riding his horny ass up against April, that is.

Raphael has a genuinely capturing character arc. He even has a touching moment in the third act.

The elevator scene.
People on the internet seem to be going crazy over the elevator scene. Personally, I thought it was kind of funny but I wasn't ecstatic about it. Yet, I completely understand the reaction. It's because it's one of the very few moments where we see the Turtles interacting with each other like they would on their down time, which is where the Turtles really shine. More of this, please.

Sliding down the snowy cliff.
Well shot, creative, captivating action. Will Arnett is hilarious. Awesome sequence.

References.
There are dark obscure corners of the internet where the TMNT hip-hop christmas album is not only a thing, it's actually infamous. I know, for I reside there often. These kind of things don't often seep into the real world though. So imagine my surprise when the thing was actually referenced. And this was not a one time thing. There is a conversation between Vernon and April for example where at some point the dialogue goes something like this:
Vernon:
"So, they're aliens?"
April:
"No, that would be stupid. They're mutants."
This references the fact that the Turtles where originally not going to be mutants in this movie, but aliens (the then-title being just 'Ninja Turtles', without the 'Teenage Mutant'). This was changed after fan backlash.
There are also references to the iconic theme song of the original animated series, like the claxon of the Turtles's car, the sounds of Megan Fox's computer being hacked (playing an instrumental version of the song) and Vernon calling the protagonists "heroes in a half shell".

The Bad.

The score and sound-design.
Although not 'bad' per sé, the score was hopelessly mediocre. When composer Brian Tyler wasn't repeating himself, he was being the millionth Hans Zimmer imitator, making the whole thing a bit generic and unremarkable. The sound design generally isn't any better, making lazy use of the 'Inception-bwam' you've been hearing in practically all trailers in the last four years. The sound design does have a bright point though: the use of cameo sounds. For example, the Turtle's car horn plays the melody of the familiar theme song of the original animated series.

The soundtrack (meaning pop songs used in the film, not the actual score).
The song that plays during the credits is one of the crucial elements that determine what feeling you're leaving the cinema with. Sadly, that song is one called Shell Shocked, made by some gentlemen called Juicy J, Moxie, Ty Dolla$ign, and Wiz Khalifa. Even Vanilla Ice's Ninja Rap would have been a much better choice, since at least it has a clear intention tone wise (up-beat, feel-good), whereas Shell Shocked just seems like generic, empty 'gansta' rap. But hey, maybe I shouldn't be that opinionated about the song, seeing as how the genre is something I know next to nothing about. If it was up to me I'd probably go with something like this, so make of that what you will.

April O'Neil is thick as a brick.
Any reporter should know that if you are going to claim that there are giant martial arts practicing anthropomorphic turtles running around, you're going to have to wave some pretty significant evidence around before anyone takes you even remotely seriously. Just assuming people will take your word for it though? You'd almost have to be certifiably insane for that kind of reasoning.

The Foot Clan.
The Foot Clan is basically changed from a group of ninjas to a SWAT team. Which is, just so weird you guys. Lay down the guns and pick up a katana dude.

Shredder's costume.
Or as I like to call it: Edward Swordhands. It's the kind of mindless clutter you've come to expect from Bay productions. It still looks enough like Shredder for people to make that comparison had he not been in a TMNT film, but now that he is supposed to be Shredder, I would have liked to see more focus and less random shit Bay thinks looks cool. Remember how the Transformers are a big mash of CGI clutter? It's that same shit all over again. Seriously, the guy is literally a metal samurai. You'd have to try to fuck that up.

Splinter.
I think the character should have been a bit more reserved, he's just a bit over the top now. One of the most over the top things about this Splinter is probably how he uses his tail. It's similar to how Doc Ock uses his tentacles. But the worst part about Splinter is how...

Hamatu Yoshi is replaced by a thrown away how-to book.
Which is fucking ridiculous. In previous incarnations Hamatu Yoshi was either the owner of the rat that became Splinter, or even become Splinter himself. Yoshi's history with Shredder is what's sets up the rivalry between Splinter and Shredder. In the new film, the rivalry seems to still exist, but it comes out of nowhere. The stupidest aspect about Hamatu Yoshi's absence however is how Splinter now gained his Martial Art skills. It used to be that Yoshi was a martial artist, but now splinter learned it all from a how-to book he found in a sewer. Meaning that all the Japanese aspect of the Turtles come from Splinter stumbling on a book by accident, that's it. That does not make any sense at all. So please Bay & co., in the inevitable sequel, retcon the shit out of this.

WAY to little Turtles.
We see very little of the Turtles just being themselves. Instead, we see them almost exclusively in fight scenes. Maybe it's because of the long build up wasting screen time. There is no need for that, just show us the Turtles, goddammit. It's what we all come to see.

Eric Sacks is useless (and incredibly generic).
It is painfully obvious that the role of Shredder was changed quite a bit into production, leaving a lot of loose ends. The film really suffers for it. Sacks was originally supposed to be Shredder, but this was changed after fan backlash (and rightly so). The downside of this is that now you have a character that takes up the screen time of a main character, while really not being that important.

Karai is useless.
I like that they got her look right. Sadly however, she doesn't actually affect the plot. She doesn't seem to have any purpose beyond being a wink tot the audience that's already familiar to the TMNT lore, which is the cheapest kind of fan service there is. In most cases, it's better to leave out a character completely than to do a disservice to the character (for the most extreme example of this, see Bane in Batman and Robin. Karai's case isn't quite that bad, the disservice to her character lies in her small involvement in the plot, not necessarily a bad character portrail).

The setting.
There is something about the filth ridden pre-Guliani New York of the original movies that really went well with the Turtles. I'm not sure why, but this is the kind of environment they seem to blend in the best. The new movie however, is set in bright and shiny modern day New York. Understandable, but a major disadvantage in my opinion.

So many plot holes.
Oh no, Raphael is seriously, possibly fatally injured! No wait, he's fine.
Eric Sacks just discovered the Turtles? Better put them in these handy Turtle sized pods.
Oh no, Shredder is off to New York, somebody stop him! No wait, he's already there.

The Ugly.

I've already touched upon the abomination that are the noses on the Turtles in the trailer review. You might think that it's hammering on a hugely trivial part of the film but in actuality, it makes a tremendous difference.
I've found a Photoshopped picture online that wonderfully illustrates why so much hinges on those noses. If the Turtles would have had their original noses (and slightly wider heads), they would look a lot more like themselves.

© Paramount Pictures / Nickelodeon Movies / Platinum Dunes / Whoever made this manip
(Important side note: If anyone knows who made this, please leave a comment below so I can properly credit this person. Sites that I've found that display this image refer to a Reddit post that just says 'Someone took it upon themselves to improve the new TMNT designs'.)

As you can see, the altered picture (numbered '1', for some reason) shows a more familiar and, more importantly, more accessible face. There is a certain openness and friendliness there. The original, on the other hand, mainly comes across as creepy. Even though Michelangelo is giving a reassuring face (or at least he's trying to), a certain uncomfortability remains. Obviously, this poses problems when trying to connect with audiences. 

By the way, when Google-ing for something like the above image, I accidentally stumbled upon greatness. Do yourself a favor and check out the TeenageMutantNinjaNoses Tumblr.

In conclusion, some afterthoughts:

-The degree in which you already have a connection with the franchise will be a determing factor in how much you like this movie. If you're the type of fan who needs to see everything remotely related to the Turtles, I obviously don't even need to tell you to go see this movie.
If you're the type of fan that has only seen the original cartoon, don't expect much of a nostalgia trip. Although your previous knowledge of the characters might prove useful.
If you have no connection with the Franchise at all, you're in for a excruciatingly mediocre film at best. Watch Guardians of the Galaxy instead.

-The inevitable sequel will most likely be better. I say that because the Turtles will probably have more screen time with the lack of build-up to them. Also, seeing as how Eric Sacks is almost certainly a leftover from an earlier cut, there probably won't be a character as bland as that in the sequel. Which in turn leaves room for characters like Krang and Bebop & Rocksteady.

That's about it. If anyone needs me, I'll be over here watching the 1990 movie.

Friday, June 19, 2015

Iron Maiden to Release New Album, Bitches!

© Parlophone, Sanctuary, BMG, Mark Wilkinson

Rejoice! The release date of Iron Maiden's new album, The Book of Souls, is set at the 4th of September. The album was finished earlier, but was understandably put on hold due to singer Bruce Dickinson's health issues. Now that Dickinson has been given an all clear, he wastes no time in continuing on the planned trajectory. Because that's just the type of badass motherfucker he is.

The album will be the band's first in five years (wait, Final Frontier was released five years ago already? Holy shit dude, time flies) and their first ever double album. The latter fact is in all probability caused by some mighty long songs like If Eternity Should Fail (8:28), The Red and the Black (13:33), The Book of Souls (10:27) and The Empire of the Clouds (a whopping 18:01, surpassing the 31 year record holder Rime of the Ancient Mariner by 4:16 minutes).

Now, with no audio to listen to, let's take a look at the album's cover.

The Artist.
Although the ideal would of course be Derek Riggs, Mark Wilkinson has made enough of a name for himself to be considered the next best thing. Wilkinson has been working with Judas Priest non stop since Ram it Down (1988), has made a whole bunch of Fish and Marillion album covers, did some kickass stuff for the Darkness and has even worked with Maiden before (Live at Donnington 1992, the Wicker Man, Out of the Silent Planet (illustrated below)).

© Parlophone, Sanctuary, BMG, Mark Wilkinson

Return of the Elongated Letters.
From Virtual XI (1998) on, there has been a slight change in the logo, straightening the base of the font instead of letting the letters bleed out a bit, giving the logo more of a bold, bulky appearance. Personally, I always preferred the old logo and lo and behold, there it is again. Sitting on top of the cover as if it never left. Welcome back buddy (I'm not sure I care about the extra border though, especially given the simple design of the rest of the cover, but now we're venturing into trivial territory).

Return of the proper Eddie.
Eddie's appearance on the Final Frontier cover was a subject of controversy, mainly because it deviated so much from the original Eddie that he seemed to exist solely to taunt Derek Riggs. Now the real Eddie is back (even his eyes seem to echo the band's debut album), which goes to show that Iron Maiden listens to its fans. Awesome.

The Theme.
Eddie appears as some kind of Voodoo witch doctor, or perhaps even Baron Samedi. I'm quite exited about this, because there are loads of great things to be done with a Voodoo theme. Imagine the lavish set pieces, the detail riddled merchandise. Also consider the fact that much of the modern concept of the zombie is directly derived from Haitian Vodou. From Wikipedia: 
"The zombie belief has its roots in traditions brought to Haiti by enslaved Africans, and their subsequent experiences in the New World. It was thought that the Vodou deity Baron Samedi would gather them from their grave to bring them to a heavenly afterlife in Africa ("Guinea"), unless they had offended him in some way, in which case they would be forever a slave after death, as a zombie."
 It's not hard to picture Eddie doing something quite similar. Perhaps without the slavery angle, in the name of good taste (not to say that such a thing couldn't be handled well, of course).

Conclusion.
Visually, Iron Maiden has made a complete return to form. I have no doubt the music will live up to this.

Up the Irons!
\,,/

Friday, May 15, 2015

Aria 13 - The Cry of the Prophet, Quick Comic Review



Plot, pencil and ink by Michel Weyland.
Dialogue and colour by Nadine Weyland.

I'm doing a review on the thirteenth Aria album without having read the first twelve. This might seem a bit out of the ordinary, but I'm on a serious budget and this was the only Aria album I could get my hands on for the moment so you're just going to have to live with it. Not that it matters that much, because save for a couple of throwbacks to earlier issues the story is quite episodic in nature.

The title, 'Le Cri du prophète' / 'The Cry of the Prophet', is a clever and cool sounding nod to the plot. Sadly, the title loses it's clever touch in the Dutch/Flemish translation, which is titled 'De Stem van de Profeet', meaning 'The Voice of the Prophet'. It is as if whoever titled this didn't actually bother to read the story, because that one word changes a lot.

The overall plot, although not all that clever and at times quite predictable, is fun. In other words, if you're looking for the next Conan or Elfquest, keep on looking. But if you're content with swashbucklin' action, welcome on board. That's not to say that the plot isn't engaging, by the way. It just isn't anything groundbreaking. There is this one awesome thing that happens in the third act though, but I'm not going to spoil any of it here. The main characters are generally likable and the side characters aren't cardboard cut-outs. The dialogue by itself, that is to say taken speech bubble by speech bubble, is fine but it jumps around quite abruptly. The resulting tonal shifts can at times be somewhat jarring. This abruptness seems to be the norm rather than the exception. Not only in the shifts between dialogue, but also within the handling of situations. For example, after a two page flashback the story starts out with Aria walking towards her companion's tent. It is early in the morning and Aria has just finished her breakfast. Her companion seems to be in the process of waking up. Aria's very first words to her (roughly translated from the Dutch/Flemish version I'm reading from) are: "Not feeling any regret about leaving Glore as well yet?" Hey now, lady, how about saying good morning first? Maybe talk about the weather for a bit? Jeez.

The art is passable. The inking is an a short stroke style that is pretty cool most of the time, but weavers into cheesy territory from time to time. Although that is of course a matter of taste. The colouring is great and really captures the right atmosphere at any moment. The design on Aria feels a bit off. The comic is from 1990, so I'll forgive the hair, but her getup doesn't seem to very practical at all. In fact, her outfit is a bit skimpy, which I guess is the point, but still. There is even a panty shot in one panel, but then again, with a skirt that high, how can there not be? Weyland's drawing of male faces is also questionable, as he draws many of them with a Neanderthal-like brow. One thing he does unquestionably succeed in however is the fact that he draws a great variety of faces, all easily distinguishable.

If you like 'Xena: Warrior Princes' (you should, its an awesome show), this comic book might be for you. I'm not just saying that because of the obvious (lone warrior woman roams the land in a nondescript medieval-esque 'long ago' era, fights for the oppressed. She even has a short haired female companion called Ganiéle in this book), but because the plot seems like something that could easily have been an episode on the show.